JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 3, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Desplazamiento Forzado
  • Requerir a la Contraloría General de la República para que dé cumplimiento a lo ordenado en el auto A.028/15
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

En el marco del seguimiento a la sentencia T-025/04, se hace un requerimiento a la Contraloría General de la República, para que dé cumplimiento a lo ordenando por la Sala, en el auto 028 de 2015.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, el suscrito Magistrado Presidente de la Sala Especial de Seguimiento a la Sentencia T-025 de 2004,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Primero. REQUERIR, a traves de Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, a la Contraloria General de la Republica para que haga entrega de las bases de datos de la "Primera Encuesta Nacional de Victimas CGR 2013", en el termino perentorio de tres (3) dias, prescindiendo de los nombres de los encuestados y encuestadas y de los datos que permitan su identificacion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.